Vital wrote:There's lots of reviews on it all over this site and internet in general. Some praise it, some say it's nothing but marketing, some call it "God-awful stuff".
Still thou IMO when it comes to taste review it all depends on what YOU (or a reviewer) likes. Kinda like movies - you check reviews before going tot he theater, you pick a movie you like as per reviews just to then say to yourself "what the hell?? This was horrible" lol.
I like taste and smell of wood a lot so to me DC is a great bourbone. It's loaded with wood, has a good alcohol burn, increadable nose... I guess one negative thing is that it's finish isn't as long as i'd like... well, who am i kiddin here? finish ends just about when you take the glass off your mouth lol. Other then finish i think it's a great bourbon, something i try to have in my booze closet at all times.
EllenJ wrote:Everyone has her/his own idea of what a decent bourbon should taste like.
Of course, there are those whose idea is so narrow that their favorite brand (at the moment, at least) is the only one they'd consider worthy to call itself bourbon.
And there are those whose idea is that anything less than 130 proof is for sissies.
And those who feel that anything selling for less than $75 a bottle is for po' trash.
And those who feel that, unless it can only be obtained by the select, chosen few, it's not worth drinking.
And, of course, those who have never... and WOULD never... lower themselves to taste anything rated less than 85 by certain magazines, in one of which the Goddess and I have the honor of being (more or less) "featured" in the current issue.
Users browsing this forum: astafjevs, Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests