Page 1 of 1

Four Roses Throwdown

Unread postPosted: Fri Dec 07, 2007 6:47 pm
by Mike
Before me are three alike bourbon glasses (short stem modified tulip glasses costing about one dollar each from IKEA) with about 50 ml of Four Roses bourbon, two of which I have never tried, and the other, a Single Barrel, is more or less untried since it is from a different barrel than my previous tastings.

The Single Barrel (100 proof) is slightly darker in color than the other two and the Small Batch (90 proof) is slightly darker than the Standard (80 proof).

Over a period of 20 minutes the noses of all have softened and the character has changed a bit.

The Single Barrel has more alcohol vapor of course, and has evolved from quite fruity (citrus and pears) to leathery and spicy (rye, cinnamon, and nutmeg). My experience with yeast in beer making leads me to believe I am detecting yeast too, but Lipman's Law of Suggestibility may be at work here. A very rich, forceful nose, captivating and unbalanced beautifully toward the rye and fruity side of the spectrum. Time, patience, and persistence yield some toffee and chocolate aromas contained in a leather wrapper. A complex nose with shape-shifting powers.

The Small Batch nose has a much more pronounced woody and earthy aroma to go with the diminished fruity rye when compared to the Single Barrel. The leather is there, but again is more restrained. This nose bends toward the earthy while acknowledging its rye heritage. Not exuberant, but robust and compelling. It too changes with time, but not in the same degree as the Single Barrle.

The Standard bottle strikes me, surprisingly, as even more fruity than the Single Barrel. It is sweeter and has a wonderful orangy aroma that does, however, seem to have difficulty sustaining itself. The nose must go well into the glass to capture the essense of it. Time in the glass does not offer up much new in the way of aromas with the Standard bottle. Still, it is more than worthy.

The taste of the Single Barrel is quite consistent with the nose. There is a sweet orange flavor that melds wonderfully with the cinnamon and nutmeg infused rye, whose bite is not aggressive. The taste is deep and complex, rich and flavorful, and maintains a great balance within its own unique strong taste parameters. A marvelous bourbon!

The taste of the Small Batch Four Roses outdelivers what the nose promised. It is richer, more robust, and deeper than the nose would have you expect. While it might be somewhat less assertive in strength than the Single Barrel, it has a thick, rich, and creamy sweetness with an orange tang that is almost perfect in its balance with the dryness of the wood. The rye spiciness is held in abeyance, but is not forgotten and rips gently across the mouth as a colorful 'tingle'. Another fantastic bourbon, brother and sisters.

The taste of the Standard Four Roses is a very gentle version of the Small Batch and the Single Barrel. Compared to many 'standard' 80 proof products from major distillers it is a raving lunatic.........but like the other Four Roses offering in this 'Throwdown', it has great balance and finess.

I am wont to say that it is the best 80 proof bourbon I have ever had. It does not seem 'watered' down so as to please the least common denominator of drinkers. It achieves a softer, gentler taste without giving away the farm. I would consider it 'approachable' for those who want a lot of flavor while not having their taste buds 'overwhelmed'.

The finish with every one of these bourbons is of a piece with their nose and taste. It is excellent, satisfying, and does not give up the balance that was achieved earlier. Neither is it too short, nor too long.

Four Roses has a wonderful reputation among bourbon lovers. These offerings serve to reinforce that. They are, one and all, first rate bourbons that have a unique flavor. They seem to strive for, and reach, a beautiful balance within their own taste profile. They are assertive, and aggressive in a restrained way. They are deeply satisfying, and offer complex flavors. Mr Jim Rutledge is a National Treasure and to all appearances, a gentleman.

Were I to choose my favorite among these, it would be the Small Batch. While the Single Barrel is singular and a truly great bourbon, it is surpassed by the Small Batch in richness of flavor.

Unread postPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 4:51 pm
by brendaj
Mike,
The Small Batch nose has a much more pronounced woody and earthy aroma to go with the diminished fruity rye when compared to the Single Barrel. The leather is there, but again is more restrained. This nose bends toward the earthy while acknowledging its rye heritage. Not exuberant, but robust and compelling. It too changes with time, but not in the same degree as the Single Barrel....Were I to choose my favorite among these, it would be the Small Batch. While the Single Barrel is singular and a truly great bourbon, it is surpassed by the Small Batch in richness of flavor.


I'm with you 100%, could not have said it better myself.

Generally, my tastes tend to run to aged, wheat recipes. I like the wood. I really enjoy a long, interesting finish. I'm not saying always, but usually,,,I find those things more pronounced in an older, wheated Bourbon.

I get a degree of those things from the Small Batch. I've had several single barrel bottles. While they were all excellent Bourbon, only one of them really honked my horn. On the other hand, I just love Four Roses Small Batch. The consistancy, taste profile and price point are me!
Gotta love those folks at Four Roses!

Unread postPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:30 am
by Dump Bucket
I am looking forward to getting my hands on these. I have the 1440 and really enjoy it. I have a buddy coming back from the east frining me these...

Not much four roses to be had on the west...

Unread postPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:49 am
by Bourbon Joe
brendaj wrote:Generally, my tastes tend to run to aged, wheat recipes. I like the wood. I really enjoy a long, interesting finish. I'm not saying always, but usually,,,I find those things more pronounced in an older, wheated Bourbon.



I'm with you sweetheart. I like em too.
Joe

Unread postPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 11:34 am
by bourbonv
Mike,
Was your Four Roses Yellow Label the old or new label? I tried the Yellow side by side with the small batch and found that I like the Yellow Label (new version) about as much as the small batch and it is much cheaper.

Unread postPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:21 pm
by Mike
bourbonv wrote:Mike,
Was your Four Roses Yellow Label the old or new label? I tried the Yellow side by side with the small batch and found that I like the Yellow Label (new version) about as much as the small batch and it is much cheaper.


What I have is the new label. I think it is the best 80 proof bourbon I have had the pleasure of sipping........it impresses me as a very sophisticated bourbon. But I think the Small Batch is richer and more flavorful. You do not seem to care for dryness in bourbon as much as I do, nor do you like the woodiness in a bourbon as much as I do. The Small Batch has some of each, but to my palate, in good measure.

For me, the dry and woody taste and mouthfeel (in suitable proportions) add a warmth to the experience, making it easy for me to slide (as I just have) into a very pleasant state of mind........I am scratching Barleycorn behind his ear and he is beating a rapid drumbeat on the floor with his hind leg. He too, is in a pleasant state of mind.