fricky wrote: For example, I beleieve that the bottle of Old Weller Antique that I purchased after the age statement was removed is outstanding. Who cares if I like it, you may not.
fricky wrote:Threads such as this (Worst you ever had) are pretty much useless. There could be another thread - Best you ever had - and the same bourbons may be on it. As we all know, individual palates vary. Why would I care what someone thinks is the best or worst bourbon? My preferences are based on what I have tasted, not what someone else tasted. For example, I beleieve that the bottle of Old Weller Antique that I purchased after the age statement was removed is outstanding. Who cares if I like it, you may not.
bourbonv wrote:Taste are different. That is why we have the review section so that you can get other opinions of a product before you purchase. If you have tastes similar to to the reviewer of one product, then you can make judgements based upon their opinion of a different product. If you find a product that you don't like, but others do, then it becomes even more important to post a review so that others will know that they are not alone.
fricky wrote:Detailed reviews are interesting and informative; however, lists of worst or best bourbons are not.
ethangsmith wrote:--ALL Four Roses products- too much acid flavor and not enough leather and grain flavor.
--Jack Daniel's- who the hell drinks this stuff?!?! Tastes like bananananas (Spelling??).
--AND THE #1 WORST EVER- WILD TURKEY 81 RYE. LORD HAVE MERCY ON US. BRING BACK THE 101 RYE!!
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 12 guests