Poll: Who Do You Want To Own Maker's Mark?

Discuss any bourbon related topics here that do not belong in a forum below.

Moderators: Brewer, brendaj

Who Do You Want To Own Maker's Mark?

bunghole
7
24%
Bill Jr.
6
21%
Brendaj
6
21%
Jim Beam Brands / Fourtune Brands Inc.
6
21%
Pernod Ricard
3
10%
Constalation Brands
1
3%
 
Total votes : 29

Poll: Who Do You Want To Own Maker's Mark?

Unread postby bunghole » Tue Apr 26, 2005 5:17 pm

Whom would you rather own the Maker's Mark Distillery?
User avatar
bunghole
Registered User
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:42 am
Location: Stuart's Draft, Virginia

Unread postby sevenmag » Wed Apr 27, 2005 6:03 pm

I don't deny being a fan of MM, so my vote went to a ballot that cares more about preserving the heritage of it, even though they themselves aren't a fan of the brand.

So Linn got my vote.
sevenmag
 

Unread postby cowdery » Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:46 am

Oh, what the hell, I think Linn should own everything.
- Chuck Cowdery

Author of Bourbon, Straight
User avatar
cowdery
Registered User
 
Posts: 1586
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 1:07 pm
Location: Chicago

Unread postby angelshare » Thu Apr 28, 2005 6:40 am

We voted for Brenda J. With Linn, we have no doubt that quality would be of utmost importance, but we would wonder about supply issues. You know, lots of bourbon being diverted for "testing" and "promotional use." :lol:

But, if one of our friends can't own it, we would probably choose Bill Samuels, Jr, mainly because we think its not being consumed by a large corporation is a good thing.
Dave & Tina
angelshare
Registered User
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 9:09 pm
Location: Luray, VA

Unread postby TNbourbon » Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:49 am

Well, I seem to be the lone cowboy for Jim Beam/Fortune, and my rationale is thus:
We frequently lament that Maker's Mark has only a single (c. 6yo, 90-proof) rendition, and posit that there is much potential there for longer-aged, barrel-proof, et al, versions. Well, at just 600,000 cases a year, they currently can't divert any to other versions.
Jim Beam/Fortune would solve that production problem in spades, though it will take some years. And, since Beam already is in the "Small Batch" business, it's not beyond the scope of reason to expect it. It may be the only way MM will ever reach that potential we all say we see, but lament that it doesn't achieve.
TNbourbon
Registered User
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:11 pm

Unread postby Strayed » Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:09 am

:cheers:
I'm with Chuck on this one. Linn should get the Maker's Mark deal.
First, for those of us who've known Linn from the very early days, it just couldn't be more fitting for him to end up owning the company. :laughing5:

And secondly, Linn would surely allow Bill to continue his brilliant and funny promotional ideas, maybe even add to them.
And when Maker's comes out with the Official Pants (black with red wax drippings, of course) I want a pair of those.
42/28's will do just fine, thank you.
I'll grow into them. :hello2:
=JOHN= (the "Jaye" part of "L & J dot com")
http://www.ellenjaye.com
User avatar
Strayed
Registered User
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:58 am
Location: Ohio-occupied No. Kentucky (aka Cincinnati)

Unread postby bourbonv » Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:34 am

I voted for the Wild Turkey/Maker's Mark merger. I think that would do both brands some good. Wild Turkey has an emphasis on quality that needs to return to Maker's Mark and Bill Samuels could probably help with the advertising of Wild Turkey, making it more interesting and effective.

My second choice would be Linn. He knows now what Maker's used to taste like and work hard to get it back to that quality. He would also have great fun making some new bourbons at the distillery - "Pants Away" the bourbon as only Linn could make.

Mike Veach
User avatar
bourbonv
Registered User
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Louisville, Ky.

Unread postby jbohan » Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:45 am

My vote would go to Buffalo Trace, they know how to make wheated bourbon and I think they would show as much respect for Bill as they do for Julian. If MM goes to Constellation they would probably be left alone, Beam might do to them what they did to Old Crow.

:smoke: :drink:
To long ashes and long finishes
User avatar
jbohan
True Friend
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Unread postby bunghole » Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:30 am

This whole Allied Domecq thing is really heating up with Constellation teaming up with Brown-Forman to counter the Pernod/Fortune team.

Diageo has done an about face and tossed their hat into the ring. All very intreresting.

Allied shareholders are really going to make some good money! :king: :sunny:
User avatar
bunghole
Registered User
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:42 am
Location: Stuart's Draft, Virginia

Unread postby jbohan » Thu Jun 02, 2005 2:25 pm

The poll needs to be changed to have Diageo added now that they have made it clear they want Makers Mark.

Jack Daniel's wants MM, Jim Beam wants MM, and Diageo wants MM.

Since Diageo does not have any bourbon in its portfolio, they would probably do the least amount of tampering with the operations at MM.
:smilecigar: :drink:
To long ashes and long finishes
User avatar
jbohan
True Friend
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Unread postby bourbonv » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:31 pm

Diageo doesn't have bourbons (except IW Harper) because they screwed up what they had and sold their brands to others. If they had kept what they owned they would have had Old Charter, I W Harper, Schenley, Old Quaker, James E Pepper, J W Dant, Old Fitzgerald, W L Weller, Cabin Still, Rebel Yell, Glenmore, Yellowstone, Ezra Brooks, Medley, Fleischmann's, Georgia Moon, and a boat load of other smaller brands. Their track record is a disaster with bourbon. Brown-Forman might be best as far as leaving the brand alone and letting Bill run things as they are.

Linn would make the bourbon better.

Mike Veach
User avatar
bourbonv
Registered User
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Louisville, Ky.

Unread postby TNbourbon » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:45 pm

jbohan wrote:...Since Diageo does not have any bourbon in its portfolio...


Diageo also owns Bulliet, though it's distilled and bottled by Four Roses (which is owned by Kirin).
TNbourbon
Registered User
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 10:11 pm

Unread postby bunghole » Fri Jun 03, 2005 1:03 pm

cowdery wrote:Oh, what the hell, I think Linn should own everything.


The People Have Spoken! I should own Maker's Mark. Wouldn't that be a hoot!

:arrow: ima :thumbup:
User avatar
bunghole
Registered User
 
Posts: 2114
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 10:42 am
Location: Stuart's Draft, Virginia

Unread postby jbohan » Mon Jun 06, 2005 9:20 am

Sorry for my error. Diageo does not think enough of any of its bourbons to list them on their web site.

:oops:
To long ashes and long finishes
User avatar
jbohan
True Friend
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Atlanta area

Unread postby bourbonv » Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:31 am

Today's Paper has an article stating that Brown-Forman has pulled out of the competition clearing the way for Beam to take over the distillery. Maybe we should start a poll now as to how long Dave Pickerell keeps his job!

Mike Veach
User avatar
bourbonv
Registered User
 
Posts: 3982
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Louisville, Ky.

Next

Return to Bourbon, Straight

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests