The "Golden Wedding" brand of rye whiskey is generally associated with Joseph S. Finch, a Pennsylvania distillery.
I don't want to offend anyone, but my reaction to both this bottle and the Nutwood is skepticism. The format of both seems very similar to the way Scottish independent bottlings are marketed, which is not necessarily typical of the American experience. That said, however, prior to Prohibition most brands were associated with brokers and not with distilleries.
While we have many examples of Prohibition-era medicinal whiskey and many bottles from every post-Prohibition period, whiskey bottled and sold before Prohibition is so rare as to be virtually non-existent. That cache of Belmont that showed up a few years ago seemed authentic as far as it was possible to tell. But how can you tell?
It's not even about trusting the offerer, because the current owner could be a perfectly honest individual who was duped. Both during and after Prohibition there was great demand for pre-Prohibition whiskey (which legend held to have been vastly superior), thus an incentive to create counterfeits which now would be authentically 70-80 years old, but not 100+.
In 2004, the whiskey-collecting world was rocked by the exposure of massive forgery involving 19th century Macallan's. Here's the story as reported in WHISKY Magazine.
http://www.whiskymag.com/news/1389.html
One thing that might help would be more provenance. Where have these bottles been for the last century and how did they happen to come to light now?
We all know "Old Man" is fishing for buyers, not for information, so I think this type of discussion is fair. That's why, overall, I say
caveat emptor.